K.1. Micromobility Devices and Bicycles Ordinance - Consider approval of the Micromobility Devices and Bicycles Ordinance, amending Chapter 58 by adding Article IV Micromobility Devices and Bicycles, and authorization for the Mayor to execute on behalf of the Town.

[K.1. Micromobility Devices and Bicycles Ordinance - Consider approval of the Micromobility Devices and Bicycles Ordinance, amending Chapter 58 by adding Article IV Micromobility Devices and Bicycles, and authorization for the Mayor to execute on behalf of the Town.]

WHILE. THAT IS CORRECT. THANK YOU, MAYOR, TOWN COUNCIL, AND YES, I AM JP WALTON, THE CHIEF STRATEGIC OFFICER FOR THE TOWN OF FLOWER MOUND.

AND WE ARE HERE TONIGHT TO TALK ABOUT THE MICRO MOBILITY DEVICES AND BICYCLES ORDINANCE.

SO YOU ARE CORRECT THAT THIS ITEM WAS TABLED AT THE APRIL 21ST TOWN COUNCIL MEETING.

TOWN COUNCIL HAD A LOT OF DIRECTION FOR US. INSTEAD OF MAKING A MOTION AT THAT MEETING DECIDED TO TABLE IT, LET STAFF PUT THIS TOGETHER AND BRING IT BACK TO YOU ALL TONIGHT.

YOU WILL ALSO RECOGNIZE THAT WE ADDED THE WORD BICYCLES INTO THE ORDINANCE AS WELL, BASED ON DIRECTION THAT WE RECEIVED FROM TOWN COUNCIL.

SO LET'S GO THROUGH THE LIST. WHAT WE HEARD AT THE APRIL 21ST TOWN COUNCIL MEETING WAS TO BRING THIS BACK TO REQUIRE HELMETS FOR CHILDREN WHEN OPERATING MICRO MOBILITY

[00:40:05]

DEVICES AND BICYCLES, TO HAVE RULES FOR NIGHTTIME OPERATION, OF MICRO MOBILITY DEVICES AND BICYCLES TO HAVE NO HAND-HELD DEVICES OR HEARING IMPAIRED. EXCUSE ME HEARING IMPAIRED DEVICES LIKE HEADPHONES OR EARPHONES WHILE OPERATING MICRO MOBILITY DEVICES AND BICYCLES. TOWN COUNCIL ALSO WANTED TO ENSURE THAT A SAFETY COURSE WOULD BE AVAILABLE FOR THE FIRST OFFENSE.

AND THEN THERE WAS ALSO A REQUEST TO DELAY THIS FULL FORCE AND EFFECT TO GIVE KIND OF A GRACE PERIOD FOR PEOPLE TO BE ABLE TO COMPLY WITH THE REGULATIONS HERE. SO WE'RE GOING TO RUN THROUGH EACH OF OUR DIFFERENT SECTIONS HERE.

SO FIRST UP IS HELMETS. SO THIS IS THE SECTION WHERE WE IT IS UNLAWFUL FOR A CHILD.

AND A CHILD IS DEFINED AS ANY PERSON LESS THAN 14 YEARS OF AGE TO OPERATE A MICRO MOBILITY DEVICE OR A BICYCLE IN A PUBLIC WAY, OR ON PUBLIC PROPERTY WITHIN THE TOWN, UNLESS THAT CHILD IS WEARING A PROPERLY FITTED HELMET FASTENED SECURELY.

ALSO, WE ADDED THAT IT IS UNLAWFUL FOR A PARENT TO ALLOW THAT CHILD TO OPERATE A BICYCLE OR MICRO MOBILITY DEVICE ON THAT PUBLIC WAY.

SO WHEN WE TALK ABOUT PENALTIES LATER, IT WILL BE THE PARENTS WHO ULTIMATELY BE RECEIVING SOME OF THOSE PENALTIES.

NOW NIGHT TIME. SO THAT WAS THE SECOND THING THAT WE DID.

SO FOR BOTH MICRO MOBILITY DEVICES AND BICYCLES, YOU COULD SEE IT IS UNLAWFUL TO A REFERENCE FOR BICYCLES TO THE TRANSPORTATION CODE 551.10 4 SAFETY EQUIPMENT. NOW, THAT LANGUAGE MATCHES ALMOST EXACTLY THE THAT SAME LANGUAGE WE ARE PUTTING ON MICRO MOBILITY DEVICES AS WELL. SO AGAIN, FOR BOTH BICYCLES AND MICRO MOBILITY DEVICES, THEY HAVE TO HAVE THESE SAFETY EQUIPMENT'S, THAT LAMP ON THE FRONT AND THAT RED REFLECTOR ON THE BACK.

ADDITIONALLY, I INCLUDED THE DEFINITION OF NIGHT TIME.

MOVING ON, FOR DEVICES WE PUT IN THAT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE A HAND-HELD ELECTRONIC DEVICE WHILE OPERATING BOTH A MICROMOBILITY DEVICE OR BICYCLE. ALSO, IT WOULD BE UNLAWFUL TO USE A DEVICE LIKE HEADPHONES OR EARPHONES THAT WOULD INHIBIT OR PREVENT THE OPERATOR FROM HEARING APPROACHING VEHICLES FROM ANY DIRECTION WHILE OPERATING BOTH A MICROMOBILITY DEVICE OR BICYCLE.

TOWN COUNCIL ALSO DIRECTED STAFF TO LEAVE BOTH OF THESE IN UNDER PEDESTRIANS, SO IT IS IMPORTANT FOR AN OPERATOR OF A MICROMOBILITY DEVICE OR BICYCLE TO YIELD THE RIGHT OF WAY TO PEDESTRIANS. IT IS ALSO IMPORTANT FOR THAT OPERATOR OF A MICRO MOBILITY DEVICE OR BICYCLE TO SLOW DOWN AND PROVIDE AUDIBLE WARNING TO PEDESTRIANS BEFORE PASSING THEM. NOW UNDER PENALTIES, WHAT WE HAVE INCLUDED IS THIS MICRO MOBILITY SAFETY COURSE. AND FOR THAT FIRST VIOLATION, WE'RE CLEARLY PUTTING FORWARD THAT THEY CAN JUST SHOW PROOF OF COMPLETION OF THAT MICRO MOBILITY SAFETY COURSE WITHIN 90 DAYS OF THE ENTRY OF THAT PLEA.

AND WE CAN EXCHANGE AND WE CAN REFUND THAT FINE AT THAT TIME.

AND LAST BUT NOT LEAST THERE WAS ALSO DISCUSSION ABOUT ENSURING THAT WE GAVE SOME TIME FOR FOLKS TO COMPLY WITH THIS, PROBABLY MORE SPECIFICALLY THE SAFETY EQUIPMENT FOR RIDING AT NIGHT TIME.

SO WHAT THIS DOES IS GIVE 30 DAYS. SO THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE IN FULL FORCE, IN EFFECT 30 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF ITS PASSAGE.

ALSO THINKING ABOUT SCHOOL GETTING OUT. THIS WOULD BE BEGINNING OF JUNE, AND THIS WOULD BE KIND OF THE TIME WHERE I KNOW THOSE KIDS WILL BE GETTING OUT OF SCHOOL, AND IT SHOULD GIVE EVERYBODY A GOOD MONTH TO, TO GET ALL THE SAFETY EQUIPMENT, HELMETS, WHATEVER YOU NEED IN PLACE.

AND WITH THAT, WE WILL TAKE COMMENTS AND ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE.

I DO HAVE A COUPLE QUESTIONS. FIRST OF ALL, THIS IS GREATLY SIMPLIFIED, WHICH I THINK OVERALL IS VERY GOOD BECAUSE THE MORE CLEAR WE CAN MAKE THE EXPECTATIONS, THE BETTER THE LIKELIHOOD THAT PEOPLE WILL BE ABLE TO COMPLY.

THERE WERE TWO SECTIONS THAT I WANTED TO ASK ABOUT BEING TAKEN OUT, AND I THINK ONE OF THEM WAS RELATED TO COUNCILMAN TAYLOR'S COMMENT ABOUT THE 28MPH AND THE 35 MILE PER HOUR BEING CONFUSING, AND I WANTED TO JUST MAKE SURE THE 35 MILE PER HOUR WAS PERTAINING TO NOT ALLOWING CHILDREN ON MICRO MOBILITY DEVICES TO RIDE IN THE STREET WHEN THE SPEED LIMIT WAS OVER 35 MILES AN HOUR.

[00:45:04]

WAS THAT RIGHT ORIGINALLY? ORIGINALLY, YES. AND IS THAT SOMETHING THAT WE ALL THINK SHOULD BE TAKEN OUT COMPLETELY THAT IT'S OKAY FOR THE CHILDREN TO RIDE ON 35 MILE AN HOUR STREETS VERSUS SIDEWALKS? I LIKE IT JUST THE WAY IT IS. OKAY. MY NEXT QUESTION.

MY NEXT QUESTION WAS PERTAINING TO THE DUAL RIDERSHIP, BECAUSE THERE WAS SOMETHING IN THERE THAT SAID, OH, WE DON'T WANT KIDS HAVING A PASSENGER ON A, YOU KNOW, IT'S DANGEROUS.

WAS THAT ALSO INTENTIONAL? I LIKE IT JUST THE WAY IT IS.

OKAY. WELL, YOU KNOW, IT BEARS REPEATING. I'M ALWAYS OPEN TO HEARING YOUR OPINIONS.

AND THEN THERE WAS ONE OTHER THING AND NOW I FORGOT WHAT IT WAS.

I THINK IT HAD TO DO WITH THE TRAINING. AND THE TRAINING WOULD BE DEVELOPED BASED STRICTLY ON THE ORDINANCE? OR DO YOU THINK YOU WILL OFFER OTHER SUGGESTIONS FOR SAFETY AS WELL? THE WAY THEY'D LIKE TO DO THOSE KIND OF CLASSES IS THEY'D LIKE TO HAVE LIKE A LITTLE CORE SET UP, JUST KIND OF MAKE IT FUN. OKAY.

OH THAT'S FUN. SO INTERACTIVE TRAINING A LITTLE BIT BETTER.

VERY GOOD. LIKE WE DO WITH A BICYCLE SAFETY COURSE THAT WE ALREADY HAVE.

SO IT'LL BE PRETTY MUCH THE SAME THING JUST UPDATED FOR THIS ORDINANCE, DEPENDING ON THE DEVICES.

GREAT. ALL RIGHT, WELL, THANK YOU THOSE ARE ALL MY QUESTIONS. CHIEF, BEFORE YOU STEP AWAY. SO JUST TO CONFIRM OR YEAH, WILL YOU DO PROACTIVE COURSES? WE I THINK WE TALKED ABOUT GOING TO SCHOOLS AND DOING THE PROACTIVE.

YEAH. WE WILL ASKED. WELL, IT'S UP TO THE SCHOOL IF THEY LET US IN.

BUT YEAH WE'LL TRY. YOU'RE GOING TO TRY. THEY HAVE TIGHT SCHEDULES AND SOMETIMES THEY DON'T WANT TO GIVE UP TIME.

BUT WE WILL WE WILL TRY. BUT YOU'LL BE AVAILABLE TO DO THAT IF THEY WANT THAT.

THEN THE SECOND THING, IF SOMEONE DOES GET THAT FIRST OFFENSE, THEY NEED TO TAKE THIS COURSE WITHIN 90 DAYS. WILL IT BE EASILY ACCESSIBLE? WILL IT BE EASY TO FIND, HOW TO SIGN UP FOR THAT COURSE? HOW TO GET IN TOUCH WITH YOUR STAFF TO ARRANGE THAT? YES, AND THE COURT WILL ACTUALLY GIVE THEM THE INFORMATION.

SO WHEN YOU GO IN TO PAY THE TICKET, THEY'LL SAY, HERE'S HOW YOU GO GET THE MICRO MOBILITY.

SO THAT'S SIMPLE. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. AND WE'LL BE USING ALL OF OUR COMMUNICATION CHANNELS TO GET THE WORD OUT SO PEOPLE WITHIN THAT 30 DAYS THEY'LL BE AS AWARE AS POSSIBLE OF WHAT THE EXPECTATIONS ARE.

YES, MA'AM. DOES THAT GO OUT WITH THE BILL? SO IT IS POSTED WHERE WE NEED TO POST IT IN OUR NEWSPAPERS, BUT WE'LL ALSO WILL DO SOCIAL MEDIA AS WELL TO GET THE WORD OUT, ESPECIALLY SINCE THIS WILL BE IN FULL FORCE IN 30 DAYS FROM NOW.

THANK YOU. WE CAN PROBABLY PLAY WE CAN PROBABLY HAVE SOME FUN WITH THAT.

30 DAYS TOO. IT WON'T GO OUT ON THE UTILITY BILL OR ANYTHING.

WE WE CAN TALK ABOUT THAT. BUT FOR THAT, WE'LL HAVE TO CHECK OUR TIMELINES ON WHEN WE CAN GET TO THE PRINTER, BUT IF WE CAN YES, MA'AM. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? IF NOT, I'M READY. OKAY, GO FOR IT. I MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM K ONE AS WRITTEN.

SECOND. OKAY. THERESA, IF YOU'LL TAKE THE ROLL.

MICRO MOBILITY DEVICES AND BICYCLES PASSES BY UNANIMOUS VOTE.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR FEEDBACK. I APPRECIATE IT.

ALL RIGHT. SO WE'LL MOVE ON. LEXIN MURPHY IS GOING TO GIVE US A PRESENTATION ON THE GROCERY STORE AT FURST RANCH ON THE

[K.2. MISC25-0001 - Grocery Store at Furst Ranch NE Corner - Consider a concept plan (MISC25-0001 – Grocery Store at Furst Ranch NE Corner) with a request for a deviation to computing parking and loading requirements pursuant to Section 82-73 of the Code of Ordinances. The property is generally located north of Cross Timbers Road and east of U.S. Highway 377. (PZ recommended approval by a vote of 5 to 0 at its April 28, 2025, meeting.)]

NORTHEAST CORNER.

THANK YOU MAYOR, COUNCIL AS MENTIONED, THIS IS A REQUEST FOR GROCERY STORE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FURST RANCH, AND THIS IS COMING FORWARD AS A MISCELLANEOUS PERMIT.

TYPICALLY WE WOULD SEE THESE WITH EITHER A SITE PLAN OR A ZONING REQUEST PLAN DEVELOPMENT, BECAUSE THIS IS ACTUALLY AN EXCEPTION REQUEST FOR A PARKING OR PARKING DEVIATION REQUEST.

IN THIS CASE, IT WAS VERY IMPORTANT TO THE APPLICANT TO VERIFY THE AMOUNT OF PARKING THAT WAS AVAILABLE FOR THEIR PROJECT PRIOR TO THEM MOVING FORWARD WITH THE PURCHASE AND DESIGNING THEIR DOCUMENTS, THAT SORT OF THING.

SO THEY WANTED TO TAKE THIS FORWARD UTILIZING A CONCEPT PLAN.

SO WE DIDN'T JUST BECAUSE WE DON'T EXACTLY HAVE AN APPLICATION TYPE FITTING THAT THAT'S WHY WE CHARACTERIZE IT AS A MISCELLANEOUS PERMIT OR PROJECT.

HERE'S THE GENERAL LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY. AS MENTIONED, IT'S LOCATED WITHIN THE OVERALL AREA OF FURST RANCH.

IT'S ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CROSS TIMBERS, EAST OF US 377.

HERE'S A CLOSER VIEW, NOT A WHOLE LOT TO SEE OUT THERE RIGHT AT THE MOMENT.

THE LAND USE FOR THIS PROPERTY IS MIXED USE AND THE ZONING IS ALSO MIXED USE.

IT'S PART OF OUR MIXED USE TWO ORDINANCE THAT WAS THE FLOWER MOUND RANCH DEVELOPMENT.

[00:50:04]

HERE'S SITE PHOTOS. THIS IS LOOKING NORTHWEST FROM 1171.

H ERE IS THAT CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN. AND SO IT IDENTIFIES THE GROCERY STORE AS NOTED WITHIN THE PARKING STUDY THAT WAS PROVIDED.

THIS IS PROPOSED TO BE AN H-E-B GROCERY STORE.

AND SO THEY'RE IDENTIFYING WHERE IT WOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SITE AS WELL AS THE ASSOCIATED PARKING SPACES.

AND JUST TO BREAK DOWN SOME OF THAT INFORMATION FOR THE SPECIFICS OF WHAT THEY'RE REQUESTING TYPICALLY THE RETAIL PARKING RATIO THE TOWN UTILIZES IS ONE SPACE PER 250FT² THAT WOULD RESULT IN 440 SPACES.

WE ALLOW, WITHOUT REQUESTING A DEVIATION OR EXCEPTION APPROVED FROM COUNCIL TO GO UP UP TO 20% OVER THAT, WHICH WOULD PUT THEM AT 528. THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED UTILIZING A RATIO OF ONE SPACE PER 150FT², WHICH PUTS THEM AT 733 SPACES. BECAUSE THIS IS A ROUGHLY 110,000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING.

AND SO I JUST TOOK A COUPLE OF SNIPPETS OUT OF THE PARKING STUDY.

THEY DID PROVIDE THAT TO KIND OF PROVIDE THE JUSTIFICATION FOR WHY THEY WERE REQUESTING THE INCREASED RATIO.

I'M SURE THEY COULD SPEAK MORE TO IT, BUT THEY PROVIDED SOME INFORMATION FROM THE IT PARKING GENERATION MANUAL THAT SHOWED AT THE 85TH PERCENTILE FOR THIS SIZE BUILDING. ON FRIDAYS, YOU WOULD POTENTIALLY NEED 759 PARKING SPACES, WHICH IS ABOVE THE NUMBER THAT THEY ARE REQUESTING. AND THEN THEY ALSO LOOKED AT SOME EXISTING H-E-B STORES THEY HAVE IN THE DFW AREA.

THEY LOOKED ON KIND OF A A NON-HOLIDAY DAY ALSO, BUT I WENT AHEAD AND POSTED THE HOLIDAY DAY AS PART OF THIS SLIDE.

THIS JUST SHOWS THAT THIS IS THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES THEY HAD.

THEY'RE UTILIZING APPROXIMATELY THE SAME RATIO.

AND THEY WERE FULL WITH CARS CIRCULATING AT THAT TIME.

SO HERE IS THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO ACCOMPANY THEIR CONCEPT PLAN.

THEY HAVE IN AT LEAST IN THIS VERSION, THEY HAVE CHOSEN TO MEET THE STANDARD BY PLANTING ADDITIONAL TREES.

SO THEY'VE MET ALL OF THE NORMAL TREE PLANTING REQUIREMENTS AND THEN USE THAT AS MITIGATION.

THEY MET THE TOWN'S MITIGATION STANDARD TO PLANT AN ADDITIONAL TREE FOR EVERY TEN PARKING SPACES REQUIRED.

SO THIS WOULD BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TOWN'S LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPING STANDARDS.

THIS IS ANOTHER ASPECT THAT ISN'T REALLY BEFORE THE COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL TONIGHT.

JUST WANTED TO MAKE YOU ALL AWARE OF IT. JUST SAKE OF TRANSPARENCY ALSO FOR THE PUBLIC SO PEOPLE KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON.

WITHIN THE ORDINANCE FOR FURST RANCH, WHEN IT CAME FORWARD, IT WAS WRITTEN IN THAT THAT THEY, THEY ARE ALLOWED TO KIND OF MOVE THE BOUNDARIES OF THESE DIFFERENT MIXED USE ZONES WITHIN THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT.

AS LONG AS IT DIDN'T CHANGE BY MORE THAN 20%, THEY COULD SHIFT A LINE.

AND SO DUE TO THE LOCATION OF H-E-B, THEY ARE NEEDING TO PUSH.

IT'S SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT SCALE, BUT YOU CAN SEE THIS IS PUSHING OUT, RIGHT.

OOPS. THIS IS PUSHING OUT RIGHT HERE. AND SO THAT'S PUSHING UP INTO THIS SECTION RIGHT HERE.

SO THERE'S A LITTLE BIT OF AREA THAT'S GOING FROM RED THE MIXED USE TRANSITION MAJOR RUDEWAY MAJOR ROADWAY NOT RUDEWAY IS EXPANDING INTO THE BLUE WHICH IS THE MIXED USE NEIGHBORHOOD AREA. LEXIN DO I SEE THAT THE BORDER IT BORDERS THE POWER LINE EASEMENT? THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY. SO YOU WOULDN'T REALLY BE ABLE TO PUT MUCH OF A NEIGHBORHOOD IN THERE ANYWAY, I ASSUME.

PROBABLY NOT. I MEAN, THERE ARE DIFFERENT USES THAT ARE ALLOWED IN NEIGHBORHOOD.

IT IS PRIMARILY RESIDENTIAL. SO YES, IT IS. IT IS JUST SHIFTING BACK TO LINE UP WITH THOSE POWER LINES AND THAT WILL BE THAT'S EXPECTED TO BE A TRAIL SYSTEM THERE. THAT MAKES SENSE. SO AGAIN, IT'S A LESS THAN 2% CHANGE OF THE OVERALL AREA.

SO THIS IS WITHIN WHAT'S ALLOWED TO BE APPROVED ADMINISTRATIVELY.

JUST WANTED TO KIND OF HAVE THIS ON THE RECORD SO THAT PEOPLE WOULD KNOW THAT SHAPE CHANGED A LITTLE BIT FOR THE BOUNDARIES OF THAT CONCEPT PLAN.

SO AGAIN HERE IS THE PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN.

AND THAT'S THE END OF MY PRESENTATION. THE APPLICANT ALSO HAS A PRESENTATION AND I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

OKAY. I DON'T HAVE ANY. OKAY. YEAH. IF THE APPLICANT WANTS TO COME FORWARD AND JUST STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. GOOD EVENING.

MY NAME IS BECCA WANG WITH H-E-B 646 SOUTH MAIN.

[00:55:02]

I WANTED TO COME HERE JUST TO SAY HELLO. AND IF YOU GUYS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I AM HERE TO ANSWER THEM.

BUT I AM GOING TO PASS OFF THE PRESENTATION TO MY ENGINEER OVER HERE.

BUT IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I AM HERE. THANK YOU.

HEY GOOD EVENING, JONATHAN KIRBY WITH KIMLEY-HORN, 2600 NORTH CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY, RICHARDSON, TEXAS. WE JUST HAVE A BRIEF PRESENTATION. I'LL SAY THAT LEXIN DID A GREAT JOB AND STOLE MOST OF MY THUNDER WITH THE PARKING STUDY, BUT WE JUST HAVE THE CONCEPT PLAN HERE, AND THEN WE HAVE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AS WELL.

I CAN BRIEFLY RUN THROUGH THE PARKING STUDY THAT WE DID.

IT'S A IT'LL BE A LOT OF THE, THE REPEAT. BUT ESSENTIALLY WE DID A PARKING ANALYSIS.

WE TOOK THE IT MANUAL AND WE COMPARED IT TO OUR PROPOSED USE, AND WE COMPARED IT TO A LOT OF EXISTING H-E-BS, THE THREE, SPECIFICALLY IN THE METROPLEX. DID AN AUGUST ANALYSIS ON A TYPICAL WEEKEND, AND THEN WE DID, AND THAT WAS 89% FULL GENERALLY THAN WE DID CHRISTMAS EVE AND THE 23RD.

AND THAT WAS THE STATS THAT YOU SAW WHERE IT WAS 99 OR 100% FULL WITH CARS CIRCULATING IF YOU LOOKED AT THE PACKET, YOU WOULD SEE SOME OF THOSE DIAGRAMS THAT WE HAD PUT TOGETHER.

AND SO WE WE HOPE THAT THAT JUSTIFIES THE REQUEST TO YOU ALL.

AND WE'RE HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE. WELL, I KNOW I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY, SINCE THIS IS PUBLIC. I KNOW I WATCHED THE P&Z MEETING AND SO THIS THE ADJACENCIES WILL BE MIXED USE AS WELL.

SO WHAT I UNDERSTOOD FROM PLANNING AND ZONING IS THAT IN THAT MEETING, IT WAS CLARIFIED THAT IF YOU HAVE ALL THIS PARKING THAT THAT COULD BE SHARED WITH ANY ADJACENT BUSINESSES AS WELL. IS THAT CORRECT POSSIBILITY? SO THIS IS THE THE THE REQUEST AND THE ANALYSIS IS SPECIFIC TO THE H-E-B USE AND SPECIFIC TO THIS LOT.

SO THERE WOULD THERE WOULD HAVE TO BE A SHARED PARKING AGREEMENT TO HAVE ANYTHING LIKE THAT.

THAT'S A POSSIBILITY. IT IS A POSSIBILITY. IT'S JUST NOT CONTEMPLATED RIGHT NOW.

YEAH. ALL RIGHT. GREAT PRESENTATION, BUT LET'S GET BECCA BACK UP HERE BECAUSE.

SO AFTER THIS GETS APPROVED, THEN WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? HOW LONG DO WE GOT TO WAIT? SO UNFORTUNATELY, I DON'T HAVE A TIMELINE.

WE DO HAVE A VERY BIG GROUP IN OUR SAN ANTONIO OFFICE THAT DOES ALL THE EVALUATION OF POPULATION GROWTH AND WHERE THAT'S GOING TO GET TO AND WHAT TIME IT'S GOING TO GET US TO.

SO AT THIS TIME, UNFORTUNATELY, NO ONE LIKES HEARING THIS ANSWER, BUT I DON'T HAVE A TIMELINE.

SO THAT'S MY MY ANSWER. SORRY. IS THAT TO SAY THAT WE'RE NOT EVEN REALLY SURE AT THIS POINT? WE'RE STILL H-E-B IS STILL EVALUATING THIS SITE, THIS PROPERTY.

YEAH, WE ARE CURRENTLY STILL WE HAVE NOT CLOSED ON THE PROPERTY.

WE ARE VERY CLOSE TO AND WE'RE WE'VE BEEN HAVING COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE FURST RANCH COMMUNITY FOR QUITE A WHILE.

SO WE'VE BEEN WORKING WITH THEM ON TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHAT'S THE BEST PLAN AND BEST USE FOR THIS WHOLE PROJECT.

OBVIOUSLY, WE'RE JUST A SMALL PORTION OF THIS ENTIRE PROJECT.

SO WE HAVE BEEN HAVING GREAT COMMUNICATION WITH THEM, AND IT IS MOVING FORWARD.

WELL, LET'S MAKE SURE PARKING ISN'T THE THING THAT DERAILS THE CONVERSATION.

YES. APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU. I DON'T REALLY HAVE A QUESTION OTHER THAN OF COURSE, THAT WAS THE $64,000 I SHOULD UPDATE MY AMOUNT NOW FOR COMMON AMOUNTS, BUT I JUST DON'T THINK YOU CAN GET HERE SOON ENOUGH.

SO OUR RESIDENTS HAVE JUST BEEN BEGGING, AND ESPECIALLY FOR AN H-E-B.

IT'S SUCH A FANTASTIC CONCEPT. I THINK IT WILL DO AMAZINGLY WELL HERE.

AND HAVING GONE TO PROBABLY MOST RECENTLY THE FRISCO STORE, I THINK THE PARKING IS SPOT ON BECAUSE ESPECIALLY HERE, AND IF YOU'RE ABLE TO COME SOONER RATHER THAN LATER, I THINK YOU'LL HAVE EVERY ONE OF THOSE SPOTS FILLED UP ALL THE TIME.

YES, WE I DEFINITELY WILL BRING IT BACK TO OUR OUR ANALYSIS GROUP.

I DON'T KNOW THE NUMBERS. I'M NOT GOING TO I'M NOT GOING TO LIE TO YOU ON THAT. I'M AN I'M AN ENGINEER BY TRADE.

I AM NOT A NUMBERS PERSON. SO BUT I WILL BRING BACK THE FEEDBACK TO THEM.

I KNOW WE WOULD DO GREAT IN THIS COMMUNITY. H-E-B HAS BEEN SUCH A BIG PART OF COMING INTO DALLAS, AND IT'S BEEN SUCH A FUN, I GUESS, AN ENJOYABLE RIDE FOR US TO COME UP HERE.

AND SEEING KIND OF THE NEW POPULATION AND EVERYTHING OUT HERE.

SO WE'LL DEFINITELY BRING THAT BACK TO OUR ANALYSIS.

GOOD. AND YOU HAVE A FEW OTHER CONCEPTS AS WELL.

SO I YOU PROBABLY HAVE THEM DIFFERENTIATED WITH DIFFERENT GROUPS, BUT I HOPE THEY MIGHT TAKE A LOOK AT US AS WELL.

YES. YES. GOOD. THANK YOU SO MUCH. DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? AND PRETTY MUCH SAID EVERYTHING I WAS GOING TO SAY. BUT WE'RE EXCITED TO HAVE YOU EXCITED YOU'RE HERE.

I KNOW AND RECOGNIZE THIS IS THE FIRST STEP IN A PROCESS, BUT WE'RE WE'RE GLAD YOU'RE HERE AND CAN'T WAIT FOR YOU ALL TO GET HERE.

SO. YES. YEAH. AWESOME. THANK YOU. VERY GOOD.

IT'S A GREAT LOCATION. THANK YOU. THANK YOU SO MUCH.

ALL RIGHT. SO I'M READY. OKAY. I MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM K TWO AS WRITTEN.

[01:00:01]

OH, YOU WANT TO DELIBERATE? DO YOU WANT TO? DID YOU? NO NO NO IT'S NOT. OKAY. SO I MOVE TO APPROVE K TWO AS WRITTEN.

SECOND. OKAY. THERESA YOU CAN TAKE THE ROLL.

OKAY. ITEM K TWO PASSES BY UNANIMOUS VOTE. THANK YOU ALL FOR PRESENTING.

IT'S QUICK AND EASY, AND WE CAN'T WAIT FOR H-E-B TO COME.

ALL RIGHT. SO, LEXIN, I BELIEVE YOU'RE. NO, NOPE OH MATT HOTELLING.

I'M SORRY MATT. MATT HOTELLING IS PRESENTING NEXT ON THE MONARCH AND DIXON THOROUGHFARE AMENDMENT.

[K.3. MPA25-0002 - Monarch & Dixon Thoroughfare Amendment - Public Hearing to consider an ordinance amending the Master Plan (MPA25-0002 - Monarch & Dixon Thoroughfare Amendment) to amend Section 7.0 - Thoroughfare Plan, of the Master Plan. Locations are generally located within the Monarch Development area and between Dixon Lane and Justin Road (FM 407). (Planning and Zoning recommended approval by a vote of 5 to 0 at the April, 28, 2025, meeting) (Transportation Commission recommended approval by a vote of 6 to 0 at the April 8, 2025, meeting)]

THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. THIS IS THE MPA 25-0002 MONARCH AND THE DIXON THOROUGHFARE PLAN.

SO STARTING OUT, WE'LL TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE VICINITY OF THE TWO DIFFERENT LOCATIONS, TALK ABOUT WHAT'S ON THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN AND THEN WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING TO CHANGE, RECOMMENDATION, THEN FINALLY OUR SCHEDULE. SO SINCE WE'RE OUT WEST, THIS IS STILL OUT WEST THIS IS VERY FAR NORTHWEST AS WE CAN GET.

YOU CAN SEE ON HERE IT'S OUT BY 35 W. SO THIS IS THE MOST CURRENT PRINTED THOROUGHFARE PLAN MAP.

HERE'S THE ZOOM IN YOU'LL SEE OUT HERE. THAT'S THE ONLY THING OUT HERE IS THE URBAN MINOR ARTERIAL WITH BIKE LANE FRONTAGE ROADS AND THE DIAMOND INTERCHANGE WITH 35.

SO THIS PROPOSED CHANGE IS ALL WITHIN THE MONARCH DEVELOPMENT.

OBVIOUSLY IT'S EAST OF 35 W, NORTHWEST OF CANYON FALLS.

YOU GUYS ALL KNOW ABOUT THE MONARCH DEVELOPMENT, DON'T NEED TO GO INTO THAT, THE WORD TWO CLASSIFICATIONS BEING PROPOSED OUT HERE.

ONE OF THEM IS AN URBAN COLLECTOR, WHICH CONNECTS KIND OF THE SMITHS OVER TO THE LANSDOWNE, GROWING AROUND THE NORTH WEST DIRECTION. LAST CLASSIFICATION IS URBAN MINOR ARTERIAL.

LANSDOWNE ITSELF IS COMPLETELY AN URBAN MINOR ARTERIAL.

THEN THERE'S A SMALL SEGMENT THAT'S UP TO THE NORTH, VERY FAR NORTHWEST, THAT CONNECTS YOU INTO THE I-35 FRONTAGE ROAD.

SO HERE THEY ARE, THE BLUE DASHED LINE IS THE URBAN COLLECTOR.

AND THEN THE GREEN LINES IS THE URBAN MINOR ARTERIAL.